| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
| Cartoons & Comics / Digital Media / Comics / Pages | ©2012-2013 *auroreblackcat |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
1. "Why don't we go and see?"
(Since the verb "do" is there, a noun needs to come after it.)
or
2. "Why not go and see?"
(If you eliminate the verb "do", then you don't need a noun afterward.)
"Do" is called an auxiliary verb when it's used in a question. What's going on in the sentence is called "subject-auxiliary inversion." This is normal for most questions, but the grammar involved is slightly tricky.
Wikipedia has an English grammar article on using "do," and it's helpful: [link]
Also, saying "go to see" isn't right either, but "go and see" is. This video should explain it better and more thoroughly: [link]
(And on another note, nice comic! I'm looking forward to seeing what happens next.)
one thing though in the 3rd panel down
it says: "why do not go to see?"
which works technically but would read easier as
"why not go and see?"